April 3rd, 2007
The Snap Crackle Pop of Political Branding
CAMPAIGN 2008: Buying Brand X: Americans now vote for presidents as if shopping for cornflakes…..
That’s the headline in a weekend article in The San Francisco Chronicle. Have no doubt that brands are the primary decision-drivers of some of our most basic choices and — as I am fond of pointing out — it is the all-important emotional association that will close the deal:
"If anyone had any doubt about how we choose the most important political
office in the U.S. … we do it by the brand rather than the ideas," said
Richard Levick, president of Levick Strategic Communications, a leading crisis
communications firm in New York. "We choose them as we do diapers or cornflakes
… we buy things emotionally.”
"If anyone had any doubt about how we choose the most important political
office in the U.S. … we do it by the brand rather than the ideas," said
Richard Levick, president of Levick Strategic Communications, a leading crisis
communications firm in New York. "We choose them as we do diapers or cornflakes
… we buy things emotionally.But as American consumers absorb as many as 5,000 advertising messages a
day, political campaigns must become increasingly savvy about how and why
successful brands cut through the clutter. "In an over-communicated age,
products and candidates both understand that they need to own something."
It’s a great article. Scroll down to the end for a savvy assessment of each candidate’s intended brand identity.




April 6th, 2007 at 7:49 pm
I’m not sure if this makes me feel good or bad. Wahhh!
But, the sad thing is, I know it’s true. It all always comes down to the brand and the brand promise. *sigh*
No, I take that back. The REALLY sad thing is I’m too young to even remember “the good old days” so, I can’t even take solace in that. Oh, well.